Last month, in a bombshell decision, the European Union’s Court of Justice (“CJEU”) demanded that Google “forget” certain items. The demand resulted from a CJEU decision that individuals have a right to request that a search engine remove certain webpage links from the search results of a search including the individual’s name. The ruling is, for all intents and purposes, final.
In short, the CJEU decided that Google Inc. is subject to the EU Data Protection Directive 94/46 (“Direction”), even though its servers were located outside the EU. As a result, Google was a data processor and data controller within … Continue Reading
On May 30, 2014, the Supreme Court of British Columbia rendered a judgment certifying a class action against Facebook Inc. (“Facebook”). In Douez v. Facebook Inc., the plaintiff alleges that Facebook used the names or portraits of Facebook users without their consent in advertisements called Sponsored Stories in breach of section 3(2) of the British Columbia’s Privacy Act which creates a statutory tort. This case, in a pre-certification stage, also dealt with the question of whether a court should decline its jurisdiction in presence of a forum selection clause or pursuant to the forum non … Continue Reading
The CRTC just released a new FAQ on CASL, replacing the old one that it released in December 2013 (“December FAQ”). Those hoping the CRTC would take this opportunity to clarify some of the more vexing aspects of CASL and the accompanying Guidelines will be disappointed, as the new FAQ largely incorporates and reiterates material found in the Guidelines and the Regulatory Impact Assessment Statement.
While there are few new tidbits, in some key respects the new FAQ only further muddies the waters. Below are some select issues.… Continue Reading